Dave Bronson
Updated: 16 minutes ago Published: 16 minutes ago
:quality(70)/cloudfront-us-east-1.images.arcpublishing.com/adn/LE7PWXIPSJBPZEC74JVXPYYNTA.JPG)
Anchorage residents and local governments have debated implementing a sales tax to reduce property taxes for decades. With the cost of living rising and property taxes continuing to rise, I have publicly supported a sales tax, but only if it reduced property taxes dollar for dollar. The latest sales tax proposal, Project Anchorage, does not aim to do that. Instead, two-thirds of sales tax revenues would reduce property tax burdens and one-third would go to fund special projects.
In broad terms, Project Anchorage seems like a reasonable compromise. The tax is intended to partially alleviate the burden on property owners and fund new projects. But like the alcohol tax, it could easily turn into a new source of tax revenue that increases local government spending.
During the 2023 budget process, the Anchorage Council moved funding for the Mobile Intervention Team and Mobile Crisis Response Team from the liquor tax into the general operating budget, freeing up liquor tax funds to fund new programs, resulting in an increase in the city's budget and an increased burden on property taxpayers.
While lower property taxes would certainly benefit homeowners and potentially make Anchorage a more attractive place for new residents and businesses, the regressive nature of the sales tax means it would disproportionately impact low-income households. This raises concerns about fairness and equity. Additionally, there's also the question of how effectively the additional funding for community projects will be managed. Will these projects truly improve our quality of life, or will they just be another way to inflate municipal budgets?
I have seen firsthand the challenges our community faces with high property taxes that make it difficult for first-time homebuyers. While a sales tax is not ideal, the potential benefits in terms of housing affordability and strengthening our community make it worth considering. However, I am skeptical of Project Anchorage's approach because it does not provide property tax relief.
Ultimately, Project Anchorage presents a vision for our city that requires careful consideration. We urge you to think through the details, weigh the pros and cons, and join the discussions that follow. Our collective voices and decisions will shape Anchorage’s future.
Dave Bronson is Anchorage's mayor.
Opinions expressed here are those of the author and are not necessarily endorsed by the Anchorage Daily News, which welcomes a wide range of viewpoints. To submit an article for consideration, email commentary(at)adn.com. Submissions of under 200 words may be sent to letters@adn.com or click here to submit from any web browser. Read our complete guidelines for letters and commentary here.
